Capitalism’s Crisis and Covid Psychosis
Decoding the Largest Mass PsyOp in the History of Humanity… And How We Can Recover Our Rationality and Our Rights
This multi-part series aims to survey and summarize independent information sources challenging the transnationally coordinated official Covid/ Reset narrative and examine the evidence that it is an on-going global technocratic totalitarian coup attempt. Then we’ll look at the richness of resistance options and ecological, planetarian ‘reset’ scenarios. Please stay tuned….
By James Heddle, Mary Beth Brangan, EON
Part 2 – Global Government vs. Global Governance
- Who is constructing the cover story and the controlled demolition of the collapsing system, and to what ends
- The un-democratic, transnational institutional structures within which they operate
- Stress Testing ‘The Narrative’
In this segment we survey the institutional structures and some key actors within them that are shaping our current world system. As noted in Part One, the constantly shifting roster of key individual actors strutting their ‘five minutes of fame’ on the world stage is important to know, but so is the matrix of interlinked institutions through which they are acting, for it is that system in which we, too are embedded. An awareness of both are fundamental to understanding that system and in designing our most appropriate and effective individual and collective responses.
WEF’s Global Infiltration Corps – Anatomy of an Attempted Global Coup D’état
“I have to say then I mention names like Mrs. Merkel, even Vladimir Putin and so on they all have been Young Global Leaders of The World Economic Forum. But what we are really proud of now with the young generation like Prime Minister Trudeau, President of Argentina and so on, is that we penetrate the cabinets. So yesterday I was at a reception for Prime Minister Trudeau and I know that half or even more of this cabinet are actually young leaders of the World Economic Forum… It is true in Argentina and it is true in France now…. – Klaus Schwab at Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government, 2017
Penetrating the Cabinets – Davos’ Sleeper Cells
Now that we know from Klaus Schwab’s own revealing gasconade that trained and indoctrinated alumnae of the World Economic Forum’s three decades long ‘Young Leaders’ program have infiltrated virtually all the world’s strategically placed governments, we begin to understand the uniformity of their pre-scripted Covid slogans, diktats and talking points like ‘Build Back Better.’
They’re all reading from the same standard WEF Playbook. And they are openly proud of it. “The network creates a force for worldwide influence through the combination of the individual skills and resources of its members.” If that’s not the very definition of an international conspiracy, what is?
Makes you wonder, who may actually calling the shots against the Truckers’ campaign against mandates in Canada?
Since the original version of this article went to post, following reported advise from the Biden White House and over domestic calls of ‘overreach’, Trudeau has invoked emergency powers, essentially suspending the Canadian constitution, in an attempt to quell ongoing trucker protests. Deputy Premier Chrystia Freeland, who also plays the dual role as Finance Minister, then announced that all crowd funding platforms must report donations in support of the truckers.
In view of Schwab’s boast that most of Trudeau’s cabinet are WEF Young Leader initiates, it is worth noting that his Deputy Premier Chrystia Freeland serves on the WEF’s Board of Directors.
According to author Naomi Wolff, declaration of ‘emergency powers’ is the tenth and final step on the path to fascism – the seamless merger of state and corporate power, now duplicitously termed ‘public-private partnership.’
Canadian Investigative journalist Cory Morningstar on her invaluable blog Wrong Kind of Green has been extensively documenting the complex agenda at work here for years.
Patrick Wood shows in his book The Global Coup D’Etat, that the WEF’s Forum for Young Global Leaders program, has since 1992, carried out a series of 5-year programs of indoctrination into WEFs principles and goals for selected cadres from various nations identified as useful tools in a long-game of attempted global take-over.
According to the the WEF’s handy, searchable Young Global Leaders website, the roster of Davos sock-puppets-in-place now includes not only Bill Gates, Justin Trudeau, Angela Merkel, Tony Blair and Nicolas Sarkozy, but:
Carlos Alvarado Quesada, President of Costa Rica
Faisal Alibrahim, Minister of Economy and Planning, Saudi Arabia
Shauna Aminath, Minister of Environment, Climate Change and Technology, Maldives
Jacinda Arden, Prime Minister, New Zeeland
Ida Auken, Minister of Environment, Denmark (author to the infamous article “Welcome To 2030: I Own Nothing, Have No Privacy And Life Has Never Been Better”)
Jagdeo Bharrat, Vice-President of Guyana
Annalena Baerbock, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Leader of Alliance 90/Die Grünen, Germany
Kamissa Camara, Minister of the Digital Economy and Planning, Mali
Alexander De Croo, Prime Minister, Belgium
Ugyen Dorji, Minister of Domestic Affairs, Bhutan
Karien van Gennip, Minister of Social Affairs and Employment, Netherlands
Karina Gould, Minister of Families, Children and Social Development, Canada
Juan Guaidó, President of Venezuela
Martín Guzmán, Minister of Finance, Argentina
Sarah Hanson-Young, Senator for South Australia
Mélanie Joly, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Canada
Greg Hunt, Minister of Health and Aged Care, overseer of the Australian response to the Covid-19 pandemic
Muhammad Hammad Azhar, Minister of Energy, Pakistan
Paula Ingabire, Minister of Information, Communications Technology and Innovation, Rwanda
Ronald Lamola, Minister of Justice and Correctional Services, South Africa
Ilir Meta, President of Albania
Gavin Newsom, Governor of California
Vincent Van Quickenborne, Minister of Justice, Belgium
Emmanuel Macron, President, France
Sanna Marin, Prime Minister, Finland
Viktor Orbán, Prime Minister of Hungary
Jens Spahn, Minister of Health, Germany
Shinjirō Koizumi, Minister of the Environment, Japan
Stav Shaffir, Leader of the Green Party, Israel
Vera Daves de Sousa, Minister of Finance, Angola
Crown Princess Victoria of Sweden
Crown Prince Haakon of Norway
Crown Prince Frederik of Denmark
Prince Jaime de Bourbon de Parme, Netherlands
Princess Reema Bint Bandar Al-Saud, Ambassador for Saudi-Arabia in USA
Paul Allen, Co-founder of Microsoft
Marc Benioff, CEO of Salesforce
Jeff Bezos, Founder of Amazon
Zhengyu He, Head of systems engineering, Ant Financial (spinoff of Alipay and the basis for the Social Credit system in China)
Jack Ma, Founder of Alibaba and Alipay
Pierre Omidyar, Founder of eBay, funder of The Intercept
Larry Page, Founder of Google
Ricken Patel, Founder of Avaaz
David Roy Thomson, Thomson Reuters
Jimmy Wales, Founder of Wikipedia
Jacob Wallenberg, Chairman of Investor
Niklas Zennström, Founder of Skype
Mark Zuckerberg, Founder of Facebook
Bono, singer and co-founder of the ONE campaign
Leonardo Di Caprio, actor and climate Activist
Wyclef Jean, rapper
And that’s just a partial sampling.
WEF’s proudly displayed transnational rogues gallery – hidden in plain sight – illustrates the description of the fusion of corporate and state power sectors often attributed to Benito Mussolini who allegedly opined, “Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power.”
A Supernational Sovereignty
“The world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.” – David Rockefeller
David Rothkop, author of Superclass and a former managing director of Kissinger Associates, distinguishes between ‘global government’ (bad) and ‘global governance’ (good). “The superclass,” he writes, “confronts issues that many national governments and multilateral organizations cannot or will not address.”
He explains, “The rise of global institutions – dominated by transnational corporations but including global nongovernmental organizations, churches, media networks, and shadow alliances among terrorists or criminals – is a driving factor in the emergence of the global superclass. When the chief executives of big companies became responsible for global rather than national operations, when their growth started coming from abroad rather than from home, those CEO’s became global citizens and global power brokers.”
That’s why he approves of non-governmental world governance by means of un-elected ‘public-private partnerships.’ “The arguments in favor of such approaches have many important merits.” He continues, “Mechanisms of global governance are more achievable in today’s environment.”
As the late David Rockefeller candidly observed, “The world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”
“Indeed, it is the rise of high-functioning, rich, global organizations that is the heart of many of the challenges that international systems face today. National governments are increasingly like the Lilliputians trying to bind the giant Gulliver to the ground. Acting alone, they can’t achieve their goal of influencing the behavior of entities that now can choose between domiciles and foreign direct investment, based on the active competition of governments for their favor.” [Emphasis added.]
“The result,” Rothkop concludes, “is a world of loping Gullivers, among whom only a very few governments have anything like the stature or resources to measure up to them in terms of global influence.”
Global Public-Private Partnership (GPPP)
This fusion of the vectors of social control is clearly charted in the work of UK commentator Ian Davis. In a recent interview with Whitney Webb, he summarizes his analysis of the phrase “global public-private partnership” (GPPP) as described on his website and clearly illustrated in his following chart. Davis’s work further elucidates the seminal work of Professors Robinson and Phillips referred to in Part 1 of this series.
“The Global Public-Private Partnership (GPPP) is a world-wide network of stakeholder capitalists and their partners. This collective of stakeholders (the capitalists and their partners) comprises of global corporations (including central banks), philanthropic foundations (multi-billionaire philanthropists), policy think-tanks, governments (and their agencies), non-governmental organisations, selected academic & scientific institutions, global charities, the labour unions and other chosen ‘thought leaders.’
“The GPPP controls global finance and the world’s economy. It sets world, national and local policy (via global governance) and then promotes those policies using the mainstream media (MSM) corporations who are also “partners” within the GPPP.
“Often those policies are devised by the think-tanks before being adopted by governments, who are also GPPP partners. Government is the process of transforming GPPP global governance into hard policy, legislation and law. Under our current model of Westphalian national sovereignty, the government of one nation cannot make legislation or law in another. However, through global governance, the GPPP create policy initiatives at the global level which then cascade down to people in every nation. This typically occurs via an intermediary policy distributor, such as the IMF or IPCC, and national government then enact the recommended policies.
“The policy trajectory is set internationally by the authorized definition of problems and their prescribed solutions. Once the GPPP enforce the consensus internationally, the policy framework is set. The GPPP stakeholder partners then collaborate to ensure the desired policies are developed, implemented and enforced. This is the oft quoted “international rules based system.” In this way the GPPP control many nations at once without having to resort to legislation. This has the added advantage of making any legal challenge to the decisions made by the most senior partners in the GPPP (it is an authoritarian hierarchy) extremely difficult.” (Emphasis added)
Enabling the GPPP’s Vision of Techno-totalitarian Control
The technocratic vision articulated in the 1938 edition of their magazine, The Technocrat, referred to in Part One, had to wait until the development of the technology necessary for its implementation. This came through the military and emerged over the last 68 years.
Case Study: From DARPA to HARPA
The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is a U.S. Department of Defense agency charged with developing technologies for military use – i.e. with the weaponization (and commercialization) of all emerging technologies. It was created on February 7, 1958 by President Dwight D. Eisenhower Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA).
The internet itself was born from the forerunner agency, ARPA’s project ARPANET
From ARPANET to the ITD
Meet the Information Technology Directorate (ITD)
The above official DARPA ‘notional’ schematic is of a centralized surveillance and information flow control matrix encompassing commercial, educational and governmental communication systems.
As laid out in an introductory PDF, DARPA’s ominously named Information Technology Directorate (ITD) mission is the monitoring, direction and control of global information flow especially in the education space.
A project under the National Defense University, the IDT has, according to a cursory internet search, counterparts in educational institutions around the country and the world.
According to the PDF, the mission is “To efficiently drive technologies that advance the educational mission, providing an assured environment to students, faculty and staff, with access to the right information, in the correct form at the right time.”
The strategy is “Advanced modeling and simulation, integrated geospatial information science and data, research and development tools and methods, emerging technologies that contribute to decision support and analysis and technology in classroom for enhancing research.”
It is a ‘content monitoring’ system that “DoD has the right to observe and regulate.”
‘Observing’ allows for artificial intelligence to absorb constant content from children’s clicks. This also allows the forming of our children’s minds to become compliant trans-humans through the programming of military and GPPP desired values, attitudes and behaviors. Ultimately the trend is toward the ‘gamification’ of education, using the powerful methods discovered via video games. Alison McDowell warns about this vision for our children’s future which we’ll talk more about in Part Three.
This military invented system is already in wide use for standardized online teaching tools. Since Covid lockdowns, education from pre-grade school to post graduate is being shifted to being totally online using this Google mediated method.
Under the guise of cyber security the ITD also appears to provide a model of the kind of internet ‘content monitoring’ and censorship that have recently become the ’new normal’ on social media platforms. Warns the PDF, “Humans are the Weakest Link.”
In a suggestive reference to personal health data, official PDF notes, “Sensitive information must be protected from unauthorized access to safeguard the privacy and security of an individual or organization such as Personal Identifiable Information (PII) or Protected Health Information (PHI).”
LifeL.og Morphs into Facebook
Wired Magazine announced that on February 4, 2004 – apparently in response to huge public opposition – DARPA had pulled the plug on its LifeL.og program.
LifeL.og was a parallel DARPA enterprise to another of its nixed programs – Admiral Thomas Poindexter’s infamous Total Information Awareness or TIA. Both programs had been aimed at harnessing artificial intelligence (AI) to establish a comprehensive panopticon tracking and tracing system for the entire U.S. population, purportedly for anti-terrorism and national security objectives.
The Wired article reported that after an Electronic Frontier Foundation expose’ had provoked a ‘firestorm’ of protest, the Foundation’s Lee Tien commented, “It’s just not tenable for DARPA to say anymore, ‘We’re just doing the technology, we have no responsibility for how it’s used.'”
MIT’s infamous Media Lab, with Jeffery Epstein as a major erstwhile funder, had bid on the LifeL.og project.
The MIT Lab’s David Karger wrote in an e-mail, “I am sure that such research will continue to be funded under some other title. I can’t imagine DARPA ‘dropping out’ of such a key research area.”
Karger was right.
On February 4, 2004 , the same day DARPA cancelled LifeL.og, Mark Zukerberg announced the formation of FaceBook. Whitney Webb documents the revealing story of FaceBook/Meta’s military origins in detail here.
“The information that LifeL.og gleaned from an individual’s every interaction with technology would be combined with information obtained from a GPS transmitter that tracked and documented the person’s location, audio-visual sensors that recorded what the person saw and said, as well as biomedical monitors that gauged the person’s health. Like TIA, LifeLog was promoted by DARPA as potentially supporting “medical research and the early detection of an emerging epidemic….
“DARPA’s own documentation on LifeLog noted that the project ‘will be able . . . to infer the user’s routines, habits and relationships with other people, organizations, places and objects, and to exploit these patterns to ease its task,’ which acknowledged its potential use as a tool of mass surveillance.
“In addition to the ability to profile potential enemies of the state, LifeLog had another goal that was arguably more important to the national-security state and its academic partners—the ‘humanization’ and advancement of artificial intelligence.”
All these handy design features, plus the monetization of the resulting data base for corporate gain are embodied in FaceBook/Meta, where the members of the surveilled global precariat willingly build their own dossiers to be mined by both governmental AND private actors and entities.
FaceBook was not the only case of projects created by the Military-Industrial-Complex that were ostensibly euthanized and then quietly reborn in the ‘private sector.’ Other investigators have revealed that Palantir, Google and Oracle also all followed the same pattern.
Readers are encouraged to examine the extensive evidence on this process for themselves. Yasha Levine’s Surveillance Valley: The Secret Military History of the Internet and Harvard Professor Shoshana Zuboff’s The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power are good places to start a deep dive into the topic.
Our aim here is simply to point to the many interlocking connections between projects long-proposed by globalist technocrats for other specious ‘humanitarian’ and ‘security’ purposes that have been opportunistically ‘re-purposed’ and rolled out under the Covid cover story.
The Birth of HARPA
“ DARPA’s success proves there is an effective government model for translating science to product. There is currently no vehicle within the federal government to do this for health.
“HARPA’s identical operating principles, built on urgency, leadership, high-impact investments and accountability, will advance scientific research from the lab to the patient.
“HARPA will work within an innovation ecosystem that leverages the best of the commercial market, biotech and healthcare companies, venture capital and philanthropy, academic institutions and other government and regulatory agencies. HARPA will innovate to put patients first.”
With ‘identical operating principles’ that would mean expanded profits for patent-holders and increased elite technocratic power over public health.
DARPA’s seamless integration with the ‘social media’ sphere is just one subset in a much larger complex of interlinked institutions, entities and sectors, both national and supernational.
Pillars and Sub-Sectors of the Globalist Power Complex
- Big Banking, Financial Asset Management and Fintech
- Security, Intelligence, Defense agencies and Weapons Industries
- Big Extractive Industries that underpin all others and provide the resources for…
- Big Manufacturing and
- Big Energy Utilities
- Big Pharma, Big Medica
- Big Cyber Tech, Big Telecom
- Big Agriculture
- Big News and Entertainment
- Big Misanthropic Pseudo-Philanthropies
- Think Tanks, Pseudo Non-Profits running cover for the Transnational Capitalist Class (TCC).
- National, Meta-National, Corporate, privately controlled ‘commissions’ and institutions
- National/domestic/international criminal organizations [and their interlocking, symbiotic connections with all the other sub-sectors.]
* * *
“The pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world to create a healthier, more equitable, and more prosperous future” — Klaus Schwab, WEF
“Fear is a market…. Anxiety-driven people are easier to rule.” – Gerd Gogerenzer – Max Plank Institute for Educational Research
The transnational billionaire class has been busy war gaming and table-top exercising the ‘constipated capitalism’ and relatedsocial control problems for decades – especially since the 2007 collapse – and has come to the conclusion that universal medical martial law based on strict bio-security measures imposed on a terrified public is the best way to go.
We will look at a few examples from the more than 20 such simulations that illustrate an alarming pattern of Pandemic Preparedness Exercises and what has come to be called ‘predictive programming,’ with ‘simulations’ bearing striking resemblances to subsequent actual events.
As investigative reporter Whitney Webb has documented, “the 2001 biowarfare simulation Dark Winter…not only predicted the 2001 anthrax attacks, but some of its participants had clear foreknowledge of those attacks.”
Dark Winter – 2001
The Dark Winter exercise was held at Andrews AFB, Washington, DC, June 22-23, 2001.
The term surfaced again 20 years later in President Biden’s recent remarks. “We’re about to go into a dark winter. A dark winter,” Biden said.
Dark Winter was a simulation exercise sponsored by the U.S. Government. Since then, so-called Pandemic Preparation Exercises have become a virtual public-private industry and sub-culture with overlapping participant lists stretching back at least to the Dark Winter event.
Lockstep – 2010
In May 2010 the Rockefeller Foundation published a report titled called Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development. (Annotated PDF here.) It was produced in cooperation with the Global Business Network of futurologist Peter Schwartz.
Commentator F. William Engdahl reports
The first scenario, titled, ‘Lock Step’, describes a world of total government control and authoritarian leadership. It envisions a future where a pandemic would allow national leaders to flex their authority and impose airtight rules and restrictions that would remain after the pandemic faded. The first half of this scenario already has unfolded.
The Schwartz scenario states, “During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems — from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty — leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.”
The ubiquitous World Future Forum (WEF) has also played a major role in the simulations market.
Clade X – 2018
In May, 2018, the WEF partnered with Johns Hopkins to simulate a fictitious pandemic — dubbed “Clade X” , a kind of stress test for the world health apparatus. It failed.
“In the end, the outcome was tragic: the most catastrophic pandemic in history with hundreds of millions of deaths, economic collapse and societal upheaval” — Clade X pandemic simulation (May, 2018)
Event 201 – 2019
Then in October, 2019 the WEF once again teamed-up with Johns Hopkins, together with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, to stage another pandemic exercise called Event 201 in October, 2019.
“The next severe pandemic will not only cause great illness and loss of life but could also trigger major cascading economic and societal consequences that could contribute greatly to global impact and suffering” — Event 201 pandemic simulation (October, 2019)
The ‘Germ Games’
The term comes from Robert Kennedy, Jr., who reports that, in researching his book on Fauci, “…what I learned was that this event, Event 201, was not a one-time occurrence. We found 20 separate pandemic simulations beginning in 2000.”
His list includes:
- Dark Winter 2001
- Atlantic Storm 2003, 2006
- Global Mercury 2003
- The SOL Simulation 2006
- Lockstep 2010
- MARS 2017
- SPARS 2017
- Clade X 2018
In his book he observes,
Scenario planning became an indispensible devise for multiple power centers to coordinate complex strategies for simultaneously imposing coercive controls upon democratic societies across the globe….The consistent feature is an affinity among the simulation designers for militarizing medicine and inducing centralized autocratic governance. Each rehearsal ends with the same grim punchline: the global pandemic is an excuse to justify the imposition of tyranny and coerced vaccination.
CIA Writes the Simulation Scripts
In his Milan speech last October, referred to above, Kennedy explained further,
One thing they had in common — most of them Bill Gates was involved in, Tony Fauci was involved in — but every one of them the CIA was involved in. The CIA wrote the script — high-level CIA officials participated in every one of those pandemic simulations.
And they involved hundreds of thousands of people. They were conducted secretly. They used frontline workers, they were training police, and hospital systems and utilities in Europe, in Italy, in Germany, in Canada, in Australia, all at the same time, to do a response to a pandemic, but it was not a public health response.
It was a response to use the pandemic for something else.
20 Pandemic Rehearsals for Global Totalitarian Control
Speaking to the crowd, Kennedy continued,
So they practiced again and again and again: How to use the pandemic as a pretext for imposing totalitarian controls and for obliterating liberal democracy across the planet.
Event 201 was a simulation of a coronavirus pandemic that occurred in New York City in October 2019.
We now know that COVID was circulating in Wuhan on September 12, 2019, so a month later, there is a simulated coronavirus pandemic in New York.
The people who came to that were the big social media companies, the media companies, Johnson & Johnson, the biggest vaccine company, and it was hosted by three people: 1) Bill Gates, 2) George Fu Gao who’s the head of the Chinese CDC, and 3) Avril Haines, the deputy director of the CIA.
Avril Haines is today the top number one spy in the United States. She is the head of Joe Biden’s National Security Agency, so she went from Event 201 to becoming the top spy in our country.
Who knew that the CIA is a public health agency? It came as a surprise to me. Because the CIA does not do public health. The CIA does coup d’états.
Between 1947 and the year 2000, the CIA was engaged in 73 coup d’états — most of them against democracies — one-third of the countries in the world.
If you look at Event 201, there was no discussion of public health. Nobody was talking about how do we get Vitamin D to all the people? How do we get people to lose weight? How do we make sure they eat good food?
How do we repurpose medicines to treat people? How do we quarantine the sick? How do we preserve Constitutional rights? Not a word was said about public health.
Instead, what they were talking about is how do we use the pandemic as a pretext to clamp down totalitarian controls and to deconstruct democracy.
They spent one-quarter of the day talking about how to make sure nobody’s allowed to spread the rumor that the coronavirus pandemic is laboratory-generated.
This is October 2019! And they talk about how to lock down the population, how to force them to take experimental vaccines, how to make sure that Black people don’t start resisting.
Because in our country, Blacks are very suspicious of the medical establishment, and they were deeply concerned about that resistance.
Just months later on March 11, 2020. the World Health Organization (WHO) officially declared that the coronavirus had reached pandemic status.
The simulation series identified systemic dysfunctions and vulnerabilities of the global ‘healthcare’ system in the face of a pandemic. Few of those were fixed.
The striking similarities between developments portrayed in those simulations and actual subsequent events supports the contention that the COVID crisis is being used as the cover story for attempting a ‘controlled demolition’ of the ‘legacy’ 20th century planetary economic and governance systems.
To replace them through the Fourth Industrial Revolution they intend to ‘Build Back Better’ with a ‘Great Reset’ including central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), Universal Basic Income (UBI), an Internet of Things (IoT), an Internet of Bodies (IoB), an Internet of Nano Things (IoNT), an Internet of Bio-Nano Things (IoBNT), and a total surveillance society mediated by 5G satellites and ground stations in which we “will own nothing and be happy.”
Simulating Financial Collapse
Continuing the pattern and echoing Cyber Polygon, an annual on-line simulation of a “cyber pandemic” sponsored by the World Economic Forum, in December 2021 Israel hosted a ‘table-top exercise’ titled Collective Strength, this time simulating total collapse of the global financial system.
Should we pay close attention?
The 10-day event, billed as a “multi-national financial-cyber simulation, ”was attended by high officials from 10 countries and transnational organizations like the World Bank, the IMF, the WEF and the Gates Foundation’s GAVI Alliance (formerly the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization).
A Reuters report described it as “a simulation of a major cyber attack on the global financial system in an attempt to increase cooperation that could help to minimize any potential damage to financial markets and banks.”
In a simulated news report – a standard feature of such exercises – the narrator says, “The banks are appealing for emergency liquidity assistance in a multitude of currencies to put a halt to the chaos as counterparties withdraw their funds and limit access to liquidity leaving the banks in disarray and ruin.” Sound familiar?
(See Part One for more coverage of the huge and largely unreported 2019 bailout of the major banks. We repeat the graphic here for convenience. )
‘Hackers’ as the Next Variant
Predictably, the ‘solutions’ arrived at centered on solidification of techno-totalitarian control – security for the bankers and their buddies and insecurity for all the rest of us in the planetary precariat.
The response would involve the melding of cyber-, financial-, energy- and bio-security and surveillance systems.
Under cover of smiley-faced terms like ‘inclusion,’ ‘security’ ‘equity,’ ‘personal privacy,’ and ‘access to services’ both GAVI and the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals are calling for digital legal identity for the entire world population, including newborns, by 2030.
The apparent goal – becoming evermore obvious with each new developmental step in the roll-out of the techno-agenda – is to build a global parallel digital cyber ecology managed by artificial intelligence.
This planetary panopticon of ubiquitous ‘connectivity’ would mean universal digital enclosure and enslavement facilitated by injectable, self-assembling nano-materials activated and controlled via 5G frequencies – a neuro-nano-meshwork in peoples’ bodies and brains enveloped in meshwork of orbiting satellites and ground stations.
But the oxymoronic contradiction at the heart of this technocratic wet-dream is clear in the core concern of the Collective Strength simulation itself: If the cloud-based panopticon is so vulnerable to hackers, and “attackers are 10 steps ahead of the defender,” how can more of the same lead to an increase in ‘security?’
Researcher Alison McDowell further elucidates this panopticon vision:
“…their new economic growth will be in data mining in order to control with blockchain biometric ID, in-home testing, health monitoring apps, 5-6-7G, smart homes, smart cities and social impact pathways where we pour our life energies into manifesting their perverse Metaverse as gig laborers shot up with nano-bioelectronics.
“We know that based on the centrality of the Internet of Bodies to the Fourth Industrial Revolution testing for COVID will evolve into biosensors data-mining our bodily fluids from swabs, finger pricks, and eventually smart toilets. It will include prescriptive behavior management and nudges that will be enacted upon our bodies, minds, homes, and cities through auto-surveillance.”
Sound like a ‘conspiracy theory?’
* * *
Beyond “Conspiracy Theory” to Conspiracy Analysis
Conspiracy analysis, as opposed to theory, is a primary, evidence-based tool of socio-political and forensic inquiry – of working to understand what is really going on at any given historical moment.
No political or social scientist or historian would deny that there are powerful actors with competitive power and profit agendas contending for control and dominance in our society. This is, in fact, the very definition of a geopolitical system.
Many now know that the thought-stopping terms ‘conspiracy theory’ and its derivative pejorative epithet ‘conspiracy theorist’ are terms-of-art in propaganda ‘perception management.’ They are easily tracked-and-traced back to their source, the infamous CIA memo 1035-960 on ‘COUNTERING CRITICISM OF THE WARREN REPORT’ about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.
The terms have since been effectively deployed to discredit, silence and debunk evidence-based inquiry into – for example, the assassination of Martin Luther King, Malcolm X and Robert F. Kennedy Senior, as well as 9/11 and many other significant recent events, including voices dissenting from the official Covid Narrative.
A person using those terms to short-circuit critical thought shows themself to be either a victim or a practitioner of propaganda – or possibly both.
Conspiracies do exist. Otherwise, laws like the U.S. Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act would not need to define them as illegal and provide for extended criminal penalties for criminal organizations and their members involved in them.
In fact, as former Wall Streeter Catherine Fitts has herself observed, it can be argued that conspiracies are the main way in which the world actually works. Fitts quips, “If you’re not already part of a conspiracy, start one of your own.” As Prof. Vighi puts it in a recent video lecture, “power is conspiracy by definition.”
Mass Mind Control As Business Model
It is also vital to be aware that the existence of ‘mass mind control’ is not a ‘theory,’ but the actual business model of a billion-dollar, cyber-assisted, global ‘influence industry’ in so-called ‘public-private partnership’ with corporations, governments and international institutions carrying out already well advanced military R&D in wireless Computer-Brain Interface (CBI) technologies.
The last 18 months of mounting censorship and social media thought-policing characterizing the Covid Crisis has made the information in Phillip’s book Giants and Ian Davis’s analysis even more indispensible in mapping the terrain and main players of the current planetary power complex and its activities in trying to carry out what could be called, with much justification, The Attempted Covid Coup.
Identifying the Main Perpetrators – both individuals and entities – is necessary to mounting an informed and effective resistance.
As we were preparing this installment for posting we learned of two legal proceedings being announced relative to the issues we will cover in this series that do just that.
On December 6th, 2021 a legal team from the UK filed a complaint with the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court in The Hague on behalf of the entire UK population alleging that UK government officials and international world leaders have committed numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code aimed at prohibiting medical experimentation on humans without their informed consent..
Citing parallels to 1930s Germany, the complaint reads in part,
“The seriousness and extent of the crimes committed in the United Kingdom, highlighted by the scope of people that these crimes affect, that these crimes continue to be committed, the wide range of perpetrators, the recurring patterns of criminality and the limited prospects for accountability at the national level, all weigh heavily in favour of an investigation”.
“WE WANT TO REPEAT: It is of the utmost urgency that ICC take immediate action, taking all of this into account, to stop the rollout of covid vaccinations, introduction of unlawful vaccination passports and all other types of illegal warfare mentioned herein currently being waged against the people of the United Kingdom by way of an IMMEDIATE court injunction”.
A lead plaintiff in that filing is Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former vice-President and Chief Scientist of allergy and respiratory research at Pfizer in respiratory pharmacology, former Vice President and Chief Scientist of allergy and respiratory research at Pfizer.
The named perpetrators are:
TEDROS ADANHOM GHEBREYESUS, Director-General of the World Health Organization,
WILLIAM GATES Ill, Co-chair of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation,
MELINDA GATES, Co-chair of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation,
DR RAJIV SHAH, President of the Rockefeller Foundation,
DR. ANTHONY FAUCI, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID),
KIAUS SCWAB, Founder and Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum,
DR PETER DASZACK, President of Eco Health Alliance,
BORIS JOHNSON, Prime Minister for the United Kingdom,
CHRISTOPHER WHITTY, Chief Medical Officer for England and Chief Medical Adviser to the UK Government,
MATIHEW HANCOCK, (former) Secretary of State for Health and Social Care,
SAJID JAVID, (current) Secretary of State for Health and Social Care,
JUNE RAINE, Chief Executive of Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA),
ALBERT BOURIA, Chairman and Chief executive officer of Pfizer,
STEPHANE BANCE, Chief Executive Officer of AstraZeneca,
PASCAL SORIOT, Chief Executive Officer of Moderna,
ALEX GORSKY, Chief Executive of Johnson and Johnson.
Berlin Corona Committee Also Prepares Litigation
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich co-founder of the Berlin Corona Committee announced that a team of over 1,000 lawyers and over 10,000 medical experts have begun legal proceedings against the CDC, WHO & the Davos Group for crimes against humanity.
They charge that “In addition to the flawed tests and fraudulent death certificates, the “experimental” vaccine itself is in violation of Article 32 of the Geneva Convention. Under Article 32 of the 1949 Geneva Convention IV, “mutilation and medical or scientific experiments not necessitated by the medical treatment of a protected person” are prohibited.
According to Article 147, conducting biological experiments on protected persons is also a grave breach of the Convention.
They also charge that “The ‘experimental’ vaccine is in violation of all 10 of the Nuremberg Codes which carry the death penalty for those who seek to violate these International Laws.
“The ‘vaccine’ fails to meet the following five requirements to be considered a vaccine and is by definition a medical “experiment” because it fails to:
Provide immunity to the virus
This is a “leaky” gene therapy that does not provide immunity to Covid and claims to reduce symptoms yet double-vaccinated are now 60% of the patients requiring ER or ICU with covid infections.
Protect recipients from getting the virus
This gene-therapy does not provide immunity and double-vaccinated can still catch and spread the virus.
Reduce deaths from the virus infection
This gene-therapy does not reduce deaths from the infection. Double-Vaccinated infected with Covid have also died.
Reduce circulation of the virus
This gene-therapy still permits the spread of the virus as it offers zero immunity to the virus.
Reduce transmission of the virus
This gene-therapy still permits the transmission of the virus as it offers zero immunity to the virus.
* * *
Stress Testing ‘The Narrative”
Finally, as this installment goes on-line, we want to note these new developments that we’ll explore in greater detail later in the series,
It seems the proverbial scales are falling from the public’s eyes around the world and more informed dissenting voices are beginning to be heard.
Pandemic of the Vaccinated
Convincing and alarming data from around the world are showing that “Heavily vaccinated countries (over 60%) have twice the Covid-19 death rates of lightly vaccinated countries.” And that “each percentage of vaccination increases the death rate by around 6 deaths per million.”
Say the Exlpose’ article’s authors,
The inescapable conclusion from all the data we have up to October 31 is that vaccines increase case numbers by 3x-7x and increase death rates from Covid-19 by 2x-4x..
This is not a representative sample of a few thousand cases or deaths from one nation. It is the full study of all the cases so far in every reporting nation. The results are in. There is a massive positive correlation between vaccination percentage and case numbers and deaths.
Dr. Robert Malone, the respected m-RNA developer, has emerged to unexpected prominence lately as a vocal critic of mass injections. Terming himself both a ‘deep insider’ and a ‘pariah,’ Malone’s statements have raised suggestions from some circles that he is offering a sanctioned ‘limited hangout’ or engaging in Harvard Professor Cass Sunstein’s suggested strategy of ‘cognitive infiltration.’
Nevertheless, we’re encouraged by Dr. Robert Malone’s Substack blog statement, in response to the Indianapolis insurance CEO who reports that deaths are up 40% in people aged 18 to 64 since the third quarter of 2021. (Death rates in 2020, before vaccinations began, were normal.) An increase this large is unheard of and is being seen by other insurers, according to the CEO. Malone wrote:
“It is starting to look to me like the largest experiment on human beings in recorded history has failed…. Reiner Fuellmich’s “Crimes against Humanity” push for convening new Nuremberg trials starts to look a lot less quixotic and a lot more prophetic….
“FURTHERMORE, we have also been living through the most massive, globally coordinated propaganda and censorship campaign in the history of the human race. All major mass media and the social media technology companies have coordinated to stifle and suppress any discussion of the risks of the genetic vaccines AND/OR alternative early treatments…. all opportunities for the victims to have become self-informed about the potential risks have been methodically erased from both the internet and public awareness by an international corrupt cabal operating under the flag of the “Trusted News Initiative”. George Orwell must be spinning in his grave.I
“I hope I am wrong. I fear I am right.”
Different Pokes for Different Folks
The Corona Committee is reporting that new evidence has emerged showing that various batches of the inoculations being imposed on people contain different dose levels of ingredients.
In his recent 7 January 2022 testimony to the Corona Committee, former Pfizer top official Dr. Dr Mike Yeadon suggested that the Covid injections are toxic by design, and were always going to harm people. “…[W]e are absolutely certain, it is not the same stuff in each vial. And that means criminal acts are being committed,” he said.
[You can look up your batch number to see if it’s one of the most toxic.]
Attorney Reiner Fullmich terms this “an experiment within an experiment” seemingly designed to learn which dose levels are required “to kill people and to maim people.”
He says that, for him as a lawyer, “the conclusion is inescapable that this is pre-meditated” and goes on to explain that, “once you have pre-meditation there is no longer any immunity for anyone, even in the United States.” Verifiable proof of intent means a prosecutable offense.
It will be interesting to see where this goes within the current legal system.
* * *
The Digital-Financial Complex
Tracing the origins of Big IT in military intelligence roots, German economist Ernst Wolff has posted his take on global governance in a succinct 11-minute video – the emergence we have been describing over the past decades of what he now terms the ‘digital-financial complex.’
In the following transcript clips he explains [his italics],
“For almost two years now, almost all countries in the world, regardless of whether they are dictatorships or parliamentary democracies have by and large been following the same agenda.
“This global synchronization shows that there is a force that has more power than any of the currently 200 governments on our planet. This force has a name. It is the Digital-Financial Complex.
“At its head are the five largest IT companies in the world on the digital side: Apple, Alphabet [Google], Amazon, Microsoft and Meta (formerly Facebook). And on the financial side, the largest asset managers: BlackRock and Vanguard.”
Data power trumps money power. Together, Big Data and Big Money power rule the roost.
“Since the use of computers and the triumphant advance of the internet, as part of the Third Industrial Revolution, there has been a second base of power, namely, data. Whoever has data has power. And whoever has large amounts of data has a lot of power.
“However, anyone who, like IT companies organizes data flows of entire industries and also those of governments in the context of digitization gets an additional insight into their innermost being and can thus make them dependent and in this way, also submissive.
“It is precisely this process that has resulted in the large IT corporations being far above all companies and governments in the world.
“Whether armaments, food, pharmaceuticals, energy or media, all these industries and all state institutions, including the secret services are now in the grip from the digital corporation, which have also built up their own global media power with social networks.
“The financial industry, on the other hand, which is always on the lookout for new investment opportunities has promoted this process from the start and is now involved in all leading IT groups through its most powerful representatives: the large asset management companies. So it is also dependent on them at the same time, both are merged in this way into a kind of community of interests.
“BlackRock and Microsoft provide a particularly vivid example of this. BlackRock uploaded its data analysis system, Aladdin [Asset, Liability and Debt and Derivative Investment Network], by far the most important database in global finance to Microsoft’s Azure Cloud in April 2020, so is now dependent on Microsoft for data.
“Microsoft, in turn is a public company and therefore dependent on its largest shareholders and these are none other than Vanguard and BlackRock, with Vanguard also being the largest shareholder in BlackRock.
“So much for the emergence of the new world power…
Wolff argues that there is an even wider network:
“In addition to the central banks, the Digital-Financial Complex, with its money and data control has also subjected itself to another network of extremely influential institutions. These include universities, think tanks, NGOs, numerous sub-organizations of the United Nations; the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the IMF and above all, numerous extremely powerful foundations….
“By far, the most politically important foundation is likely to be the Switzerland-based World Economic Forum, under the direction of the German professor, Klaus Schwab. The WEF has not only gathered a network of the rich and powerful of the world for half a century, it has also trained the international political and corporate elite since the early 1990s.
“On the political side, these include Angela Merkel, Nicolas Sarkozy, Tony Blair, Emmanuel Macron, Annalena Baerbock and Cem Özdemir. On the corporate side among others, Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, Steve Ballmer and Jack Ma….
“The Digital-Financial Complex has given us a new global power, that has long since incorporated the Deep State of all nations on Earth and now exercises much more influence than any individual deep state could ever have been able to do.
“And yet, the Digital-Financial Complex is facing an insoluble problem in our time. Its rise is accompanied by a process of concentration of money in fewer and fewer hands, which forces it to act more and more authoritarian and dictatorial and therefore, how we have just experienced in the past two years, with every further step inevitably brings it into ever-sharper contradiction to the mass of the population. And that is exactly what will ultimately be its undoing.
“The time is ripe for a democratic system of money and governance.”
We couldn’t agree more.
Preview of Coming Infractions
What comes clear from our exploration so far is that there is no single, central cadre of Bad Guys that we can – to quote George H. W. Bush’s apocryphal phrase – “chase down the street and hang from lampposts.” Rather there is an ecology of overlapping, yet contending agendas in play with a complex cast of approximately 6,000 heavies and the meta-national web of institutional structures through which they operate.
Hyphenated labels like ‘Military-Industrial-, ‘Medical-Industrial-,’ or even ‘Medical-Military-Intelligence-Industrial Complex,’ or Professor Wolff’s ‘Digital-Financial Complex’ are suggestive, but not definitive.
This is not to say that individual actors cannot and should not be prosecuted for their individual crimes. But once they are removed others will likely find ways to perpetuate the criminality. The current system both produces and selects for sociopathy. It is this world system itself – and its underlying values and assumptions – that must be transformed.
In the following installments of this series we’ll continue our inquiry into who is doing what and with which and to whom…and what we can collectively do about it.
To identify the power holders and understand the structures of their power is to empower ourselves.
Check out Part Three – Managers, Means and Methods
In the final installment –What Is To Be Done – we’ll begin what will be an on-going exploration of what we can all do to make the ‘End Times’ be just the beginning of a peoples’ planetarian reset.
Please stay tuned, help spread the word and support our work with a tax-free donation.
James Heddle and Mary Beth Brangan co-direct EON, the Ecological Options Network a tax-exempt, non-profit organization.
EON’s coverage of the recent Health Freedom Rally at San Francisco’s Golden Gate is here:
On Substack (Please subscribe)
On Planetarian Perspectives
The EON feature documentary SHUTDOWN – The San Onofre Syndrome is now in post-production and will be released soon.